WIMBLEDON 2009
Not sure which was a better match - the 2008 final (Federer v. Nadel) or the 2009 (Federer v. Roddick). Maybe the are really incomparable. Both were matches for the ages (so to speak). What an interesting final on so many levels. Roddick has been just on the outside of numerous Grand Slam titles while Federer just claimed a record 15th Grand Slam championships.It was so heart-breaking to watch Andy Roddick play probably the best tournament of his life and then the best match of his career and come up just short of the hoisting the championship trophy. Rodger Federer is such a champion on so many level. He deserved the title just as much.
No losers in this match. Really the game of tennis won today. Just wow as those two played 4 1/2 hours of great tennis. I really wanted this match to go on for another hour but at some point it must end.
posted by Stephen Hinkel at
4:30 PM
1 Comments:
Couldn't agree with you more, this was such a great match to watch. So sad Andy couldn't have pulled this out, since Roger's won so many. But you must have woken up pretty early to watch this right? That's a dedicated tennis fan!
By
Rachel H., at 3:42 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home